It lays out the granting organization’s workflow (how they expect to create a fund) and attempts to maps that onto the current Hypha workflow.
The orders of these two workflows diverge somewhat significantly, and might create significant barriers to potential users adopting Hypha. (I know Bernard has mentioned this in the past in some Hypha calls, but we’d like to validate this with our users.)
- First, does the granting organization’s workflow I’ve outline match with that of your organization?
- Second, do you think any aspects of the current Hypha workflow might be a barrier to your organization’s adoption/continued use of Hypha (especially if you didn’t have the support of the Hypha community)?